Gursky has a very neutral objective approach that strives for a linear structure and it’s that linear structure that first captured my respect. He said, “I’m looking for moments when reality corresponds to the composition of a painting”. New York’s Museum of Modern Art described the artist’s work as, “a sophisticated art of unembellished observation”.
The 1999 “Rhein II” is one of Gursky’s favorite photos. He said, “It says a lot using the most minimal means. For me, it is an allegorical picture… about the meaning of life and the way things are…and about the fullness and emptiness”.
Art history was made when an anonymous buyer paid a record-breaking $4.34 million for Andreas Gursky’s photograph of the Rhein II. Incidentally, he also owns the record for the second most expensive photograph called “99 Cent“, which sold for $3.3 million. The Rhein II may very well be his favorite when you consider the amount gained by its sale at New York’s Christies in November 2011.
I went through several stages when I first saw the image and auction price:
The art and photographic worlds were buzzing about the photograph and its merits. People declared this justification that photography is now cemented as an art medium banishing any naysayers. That statement alone aggravated me because I think Alfred Stieglitz already proved that point in the early part of the 20th century. The first photograph was made by the “camera obscura,” in 1814 by Joseph Niépce. Are we still having this discussion in 2012? I digress. Others say it’s a random snapshot and just didn’t understand the fuss.
Now months later, I finally did my homework and reviewed Gursky’s work. To appreciate him, you need to look at his body of work. Looking at one image will not sell you on his greatness. I agree that he is a great artist but my enthusiasm for him is not extreme. By that I mean, I’m in no rush to purchase a print because his work is just not my style. Nevertheless, I recognize his impact and cannot help to be inspired by what his work represents.
One should note that his images are meant to be viewed at a much larger scale and the postage stamp size images I show do not do them justice. Below are my favorite photographs because of their abstract and linear structure. I enjoy abstracting life but while I will typically come close to a subject Gursky pulls away from his subjects:
Montparnasse, Paris, 1993
PCF, Paris, 2003
Times Square, New York, 1997
I’m reminded by my first blog, “The Rules of Art” and how there are none. I put the question to you. What do you think of his work and his influence? Great artists are often misunderstood, however, Gursky does not appear to have that problem. Is there something the art world knows that the general public is unaware of? I can tell you I have used a 4×5 camera and there is nothing snapshot about it. It is a labor-intensive piece of equipment. He is composing his work and there are no accidents. Is the Rhien II a piece of art worth $4.34 Million above all the great masters? Please join the conversation and tell me what you think?
Much of my education on Gursky came from this video A Gursky World by Ben Lewis. Ben’s enthusiasm for Gursky is so great it made me want to like Gursky even more. I highly recommend this video if you want to learn more about Gursky.
1 thought on “Gursky is the greatest photographer you never heard of”
Woh I enjoy your blog posts, saved to fav!